The use of S235JR (a European "non-alloy structural steel" per EN 10025-2) in cold-formed steel structures presents specific challenges due to its inherent material properties, despite its popularity and cost-effectiveness. Here's a breakdown of the challenges and potential solutions:
Challenges with S235JR in Cold-Forming:
Limited Strain Hardening & Lower Yield Strength:
Challenge: S235JR has a relatively low minimum yield strength (ReH = 235 MPa) compared to steels like S350GD (G550) often used for cold-forming. Crucially, it exhibits modest strain hardening during forming. This means formed sections might not achieve significantly higher strength in critical areas compared to hot-rolled equivalents.
Consequence: Less efficient structures (heavier sections needed) and potentially reduced section strength after forming compared to higher-strength cold-formed steels. May not fully leverage the benefits of cold-forming.
Less Predictable Yield Strength:
Challenge: The actual yield strength of S235JR sourced as sheet/coil can vary significantly above the 235 MPa minimum. While hot-rolled profiles have defined section properties, the final strength of a cold-formed S235JR member depends on how much strain hardening occurred in specific locations during forming, which is non-uniform and complex to model precisely.
Consequence: Difficulty in accurately predicting the ultimate strength and stiffness of the formed section for design calculations, leading to potential over-design or unforeseen performance issues.
Higher Anisotropy:
Challenge: S235JR tends to have more pronounced anisotropy (different properties in different directions) compared to steels specifically optimized for cold-forming (like those produced to EN 10346 - Continuously hot-dip coated steel).
Consequence: Increased susceptibility to localised weaknesses, edge cracking, unpredictable deformation behavior (especially earring), and inconsistent mechanical properties across the width of the formed section.
Ductility Limitations & Potential for Edge Cracking:
Challenge: While generally ductile, S235JR (especially thicker gauges) may not possess the extreme ductility requirements of deep drawing steels. Sharp bends or high-strain forming operations can push the material beyond its limits, causing edge cracks or surface imperfections.
Consequence: Reduced fatigue life at stress concentrations, potential points of failure initiation, compromised aesthetics, and strict limitations on achievable bend radii.
Susceptibility to Local Buckling:
Challenge: The lower yield strength combined with potentially less strain hardening makes thinner elements (like webs or slender flanges) formed from S235JR more prone to local buckling under compression loads.
Consequence: Design constraints requiring more material (stiffer sections, closer stiffeners) to prevent buckling, reducing efficiency.
Standard Design Assumptions (Eurocode 3 - EN 1993-1-3):
Challenge: The rules in EN 1993-1-3 for determining the enhanced strength of cold-formed sections due to strain hardening, effective widths for local buckling, and local capacity of corners were primarily developed and validated for higher-strength steels specifically produced for cold-forming (e.g., S320GD, S350GD).
Consequence: Applying these design rules directly to S235JR sections might be less accurate or overly conservative, as the material's lower strength and strain hardening behavior differ significantly.
Solutions and Mitigation Strategies:
Material Selection Considerations:
Prioritize Higher-Strength Alternatives: Where structurally efficient lightweight design is critical, opt for cold-forming steels meeting EN 10346 (e.g., S320GD, S350GD, S550GD) or EN 10268 (high yield strength cold forming steels). These offer significantly higher base strength, better strain hardening potential, and controlled anisotropy.
Source Carefully: If using S235JR, ensure it meets the specific requirements of EN 10143 (Continuously hot-dip zinc-coated steel sheet and strip - dimensional and shape tolerances) or EN 10268 for cold-forming grade S235JR+Z (if available). Specify tight controls on chemistry if possible.
Confirm Mechanical Properties: Require mill certification and potentially perform incoming material testing, especially for yield strength variability and ductility (e.g., elongation, bend tests).
Design Optimizations:
Conservative Assumptions: Assume minimal or no strength increase from strain hardening for design calculations unless specific test data for the formed section is available. Base design primarily on the minimum guaranteed yield strength (235 MPa).
Increase Section Thickness: Compensate for lower strength by using thicker gauges than would be needed with higher-strength steels, accepting higher weight.
Minimize Slenderness: Increase stiffener frequency, reduce unsupported widths of flanges/webs, avoid excessively slender sections to combat local buckling.
Avoid Stress Concentrations: Design smooth transitions, generous bend radii (critical!), avoid abrupt changes in section, and optimize hole placement. Bend Radii: Use much larger bend radii than the material thickness (e.g., R_min >= 2t, potentially larger).
Advanced Modeling (FEA): Use Finite Element Analysis with realistic material models incorporating anisotropic plasticity and forming history to better predict final properties, stresses, and potential failure modes, especially for complex shapes. Correlate with physical testing.
Fabrication Process Control:
Generous Bend Radii: This is paramount. Use significantly larger bend radii than would be acceptable for higher-strength cold-forming steels. Avoid sharp bends entirely.
Precision Tooling: Ensure high-quality, well-maintained dies and punches designed specifically for forming mild steel with large radii.
Minimize Cold Work: Optimize forming sequences to minimize the number of high-strain operations or passes.
Edge Quality: Ensure cut edges are clean (e.g., laser cutting, high-quality shearing) and deburred to prevent stress risers initiating cracks.
Quality Control: Implement rigorous in-process inspection for edge cracks, surface defects, and dimensional accuracy. Perform bend tests on sample pieces.
Conclusion:
While S235JR can be cold-formed for certain applications (e.g., non-structural cladding profiles, light framing elements where efficiency isn't critical), its inherent limitations in strength, predictable strength increase, anisotropy, and ductility pose significant challenges for efficient and predictable structural performance. These challenges often lead to over-design (heavier sections) and necessitate strict fabrication controls.
For critical or heavily loaded structural cold-formed sections, steels specifically produced for cold-forming (like S350GD/G550 to EN 10346) are vastly superior and should be the preferred choice. Using S235JR requires a cautious design approach based on its minimum yield strength, generous bend radii, conservative section modeling, and meticulous fabrication control to mitigate risks like edge cracking and unpredictable performance. Consulting EN 1993-1-3 with careful consideration of its applicability to S235JR is essential.
Just like you, 70% customers choose long-term cooperation with BBN steel not only for our good product and service quality, good reputation in the international market, but also for our experienced one-stop raw material supply and further steel processing!
